Women in the Church Pt 1

[Amie]

Doug (aka "Ozark") is blogging on women in the church :type: :

http://thorncrown.squarespace.com/journal/2007/11/6/women-in-the-church-part-1.html

Shall we listen in? :coffee: (No pressure Doug :1231: - hahaha!)

Amie

[ozark]

No pressure? :eek: LOL! Keep in mind I am writing to a largely dispensationalist audience, but you still might enjoy it. By all means, comment if you have some ideas.

[Amie]

Doug posted Pt 2!!

http://thorncrown.squarespace.com/journal/2007/11/8/women-in-the-church-part-2.html

:9_cool:

[Amie]

I've been slow!

Here are parts 3:

http://thorncrown.squarespace.com/journal/2007/11/14/women-in-the-church-part-3.html

and 4 (the conclusion):

http://thorncrown.squarespace.com/journal/2007/11/15/women-in-the-church-part-4.html

I would love to hear everyone's thoughts on this, and Doug, I find myself wondering what you've experienced.. why you wrote what you wrote. (If you are comfortable with sharing of course!)

Amie

[ozark]

Amie,
I would be lying if I said seeing the way you and others have been pushed around by men at various forums had nothing to do with these articles. Also, I get so tired of the “your scripture verses my scripture” way of debating. Instead of taking one side or another on issues such as this, we need to step back and try to see the big picture. Why did Paul say one thing and then do another? How can both views be true instead of either/or. That is the approach I tried to take in these posts.